Born Into the Ad:
How Gen Z Inherited a World Where Entertainment and Advertising Became One
Faces of late-stage capitalism
Look, Gen Z Didn’t Ask for This
I’m not here to throw shade at Gen Z—nothing about this is their fault. They didn’t invent this world where content and commerce collapsed into one seamless current. They were born in it. They’re the first generation to come of age in a media environment where every headline, every video, every “lifestyle hack” is also a product, an experience, or a brand message. If anything, what they “can’t tell” is because the distinction vanished long ago—and the rest of us should’ve warned them.
How Media Evolved: Ads, Entertainment & Mystery Disclosures
Take Good Morning America. On paper, it’s a morning show—a mix of news, interviews, human interest, weather, lifestyle. But embedded inside are “Deals & Steals” segments: curated products, promotions, sales picks. Tory Johnson walks through items with “exclusive discounts,” beauty picks, gadgets, etc. (Good Morning America)
Here’s the catch: the show often doesn’t make prominent disclosure during the segment that they benefit financially if you buy those items. MousePrint found some “Deals & Steals” segments had no oral disclosure that Good Morning America receives commissions from featured product sales (MousePrint). When disclosures exist, they’re buried in website footers, tiny credits, or vague “promotional consideration” lines. Viewers may watch what feels like editorial content without realizing it doubles as a commercial.
This is where “church and state” (editorial vs commercial) gets murky. Traditional journalism ethics insisted these lines be clear. Regulation exists—FTC guidelines, FCC sponsorship ID rules—but enforcement is weak, especially for “native” advertising where the ad intentionally mimics editorial content (Wikipedia: Native Advertising).
For Gen Z, fed from birth on this hybrid content, the expectation is baked in: everything has a sales layer.
Influencers as Mascots: The Brand + The Person = One
Influencers don’t just endorse. They are the brand. Their identity, lifestyle, and social feeds are calibrated to drive commerce.
Product lines: From beauty to fashion, many influencers launch entire brands rather than just doing ads (Vogue Business).
Always-on promotion: Vlogs, “morning routine” videos, travel diaries—they’re content, but also rolling product placements.
Native integration: Brand deals blend into aesthetics and storytelling, rather than feeling like interruptions.
Gen Z doesn’t just expect this; they assume it. Influencers have become mascots for commerce-powered personal brands.
The Kardashians: Blueprint for Content-Commerce Fusion
No one engineered this fusion better than the Kardashians.
Keeping Up with the Kardashians wasn’t just entertainment; it was a marketing platform for fashion lines, beauty products, public appearances, and more (Digital Agency Network).
Kim Kardashian’s brand Skims launched in 2019 and hit a $4B valuation by 2023, fueled by her public persona and social media reach (Financial Times).
Kylie Jenner built Kylie Cosmetics largely through Instagram hype, product drops, and personal branding (Vogue Business).
Even early ventures like Dash boutiques tied commerce to reality TV exposure (Wikipedia: Dash Boutique).
Kris Jenner wasn’t a lawyer — but she was the architect. She managed contracts, spin-offs, endorsements, product lines, social media, reality TV—all the pipes through which commerce and content merged into one empire.
The Line Is the Show
Gen Z doesn’t just watch brand activations — they wait for them.
A 2024 Axios survey with The New Consumer found 60% of Gen Z Americans waited 30 minutes or more in the past year for a hyped restaurant or food event, treating the wait as part of the experience (Axios). Another study reported that 60% say waiting in line for a hot retail drop is part of the fun (Raritan Neighbors).
And physical presence matters: 83% of Gen Z say brands with stores, pop-ups, or IRL activations feel more credible than those without (Studio Butch).
For them, the queue is content. It’s anticipation, scarcity, bragging rights, TikTok fuel, a ritual. Entertainment is the interaction. The line is the pre-game.
How Society Let It Happen — And What Gen Z Inherits
This world didn’t appear overnight; economics, tech, and cultural incentives paved the way.
Media pressures: TV ad revenue collapsed, streaming and social fragmented audiences. Content that sells product is far more profitable than content that sells ad space.
Platform incentives: Algorithms reward engagement. Brand collabs, lifestyle drops, influencer routines all generate clicks, likes, shares (Vogue Business).
Weak regulation: FTC requires disclosure for endorsements, but placement and clarity vary wildly (FTC Guides). Good Morning America’s affiliate sales disclosures often live at the bottom of web pages, not in the show itself (MousePrint).
Cultural adaptation: Gen Z knows every post could be an ad. Their filter isn’t “is this sponsored?” but “is this worth my time?”
They inherit skepticism, fatigue, and power: callouts, cancellations, and backlash hit fast if brands cross trust lines.
Final Thought
Gen Z didn’t ask for a world where ads swallowed entertainment. We built it around them—through media companies blurring editorial lines, platforms rewarding engagement over clarity, influencers monetizing every pixel, and brands chasing cultural clout.
Now they live in the aftermath: a culture where every story might be selling something. And if brands want to keep their attention, they’ll need to learn that while attention may be cheap, credibility is not.
